Skip to content
The July 2026 results are in: WriteHuman takes #1, Undetectable AI moves up to #2.Read the full analysis →
HumanizerBench

Fairness & Corrections

Build an AI humanizer that isn’t in the benchmark yet? Submit it for a future cycle. The rest of this page covers how vendors already tested can dispute a result.

How rankings are computed

Every rank on HumanizerBench comes from a deterministic scoring script run over a published cycle of inputs, humanized outputs, and detector scores. We do not hand-edit rankings. For the full formula, weights, and penalty rules, read the methodology page.

What we publish that you can audit

How to dispute a result

Email contact@humanizerbench.com with the subject line Dispute: [Cycle], [Humanizer]. Include:

  1. Which result you dispute (cycle, humanizer, sample ID).
  2. What specifically looks wrong — for example, the published output isn't representative of what the tool produces for that input, the plan or settings we used were wrong, or a detector verdict or score looks off. A humanizer's output varies from run to run, so we don't expect an exact reproduction; point us to the discrepancy you can demonstrate.
  3. Any details about your test setup (account tier, plan, settings, region, time of day) that would help us reproduce the issue.

We respond within 14 business days.

What we won't do

WriteHuman disclosure

HumanizerBench is operated by WriteHuman (https://writehuman.ai). We disclose this on every page. The longer version of why we built this and how we handle the conflict is on its own page. Our anti-bias commitments:

  1. WriteHuman is tested using the exact same methodology and scoring as every other humanizer.
  2. The scoring script is public and deterministic.
  3. We have never adjusted rankings to favor WriteHuman, and we will publicly document any future change to methodology, scoring, or penalty rules.