Head to head · September 2026 cycle
AI Humanize io vs Super Humanizer
AI Humanize io finished 12.0 points ahead of Super Humanizer in the September 2026 cycle, 72.94 to 60.97, ranking #4 against #11 in a field of 14. AI Humanize io scored higher on 3 of 5 detectors and 5 of 7 writing categories. Super Humanizer came out ahead on business email prompts (53.7 vs 46.2), Copyleaks (63.7 vs 60.6) and news article prompts (73.9 vs 71.8). The bypass-rate gap, 81.5 to 64.4, sits inside both tools' 95% confidence intervals, so treat bypass as a draw.
- Detectors
- 3 – 2
- Categories
- 5 – 2
- Components
- 4 – 1
Score components
What the overall score is made of: bypass rate weighs 42%, meaning preservation 32%, readability 16%, consistency across categories 10%. Output-quality penalties come off the total. How scoring works →
CIs overlap marks a gap that sits inside both tools' published 95% confidence intervals for that component; it may not survive another cycle.
Detector by detector
Share of each tool's outputs that a detector classified as human-written. AI Humanize io took 3 of 5.
Writing categories
Category score per writing context: bypass credit only for real rewrites, blended with the category's own meaning preservation and readability. Small categories swing; the prompt count is shown on each row. How category scores work →
Head-to-head history
Overall score in every cycle both tools were tested. AI Humanize io has finished ahead in 4 of 4 shared cycles.
| Cycle | AI Humanize io | Super Humanizer | Margin |
|---|---|---|---|
| September 2026 | 72.94 #4 | 60.97 #11 | ← 12.0 |
| August 2026 | 64.57 #6 | 55.86 #10 | ← 8.7 |
| July 2026 | 59.66 #10 | 54.13 #11 | ← 5.5 |
| June 2026 | 72.95 #6 | 64.75 #11 | ← 8.2 |
Where each one wins
Every measure above that one tool won outright, largest margin first within each group.
AI Humanize io
12 wins- Penalties Score −1.0 vs −5.0
- Bypass rate Score 81.5 vs 64.4
- Readability Score 58.4 vs 52.1
- Consistency Score 69.2 vs 68.5
- Winston AI Detector 79.0 vs 52.2
- Originality.ai Detector 93.3 vs 71.0
- GPTZero Detector 55.8 vs 54.6
- Marketing Copy Category 82.4 vs 51.2
- Academic Essay Category 80.3 vs 55.2
- Blog Post Category 80.9 vs 58.8
- and 2 more
Super Humanizer
5 wins- Meaning preservation Score 74.2 vs 73.2
- Copyleaks Detector 63.7 vs 60.6
- ZeroGPT Detector 76.9 vs 75.0
- Business Email Category 53.7 vs 46.2
- News Article Category 73.9 vs 71.8
Questions people ask
Is AI Humanize io better than Super Humanizer?
AI Humanize io finished 12.0 points ahead of Super Humanizer in the September 2026 cycle, 72.94 to 60.97, ranking #4 against #11 in a field of 14. AI Humanize io scored higher on 3 of 5 detectors and 5 of 7 writing categories. Both tools ran the same 33 prompts, scored by the same 5 detectors, under methodology v1.2.0; every input, output and verdict is published.
Which bypasses AI detectors better, AI Humanize io or Super Humanizer?
AI Humanize io posted the higher bypass rate, 81.5 vs 64.4, and scored higher on 3 of 5 detectors. AI Humanize io led on GPTZero, Originality.ai and Winston AI; Super Humanizer led on Copyleaks and ZeroGPT. The overall bypass gap is inside both 95% confidence intervals, so it is not a reliable difference.
Do AI Humanize io and Super Humanizer keep the original meaning?
Super Humanizer preserved meaning better, 74.2 vs 73.2 on our 0–100 similarity scale, though the confidence intervals overlap. On readability, AI Humanize io rated higher, 58.4 vs 52.1. Penalties this cycle: AI Humanize io −1.0, Super Humanizer −5.0.