Head to head · July 2026 cycle
NoteGPT vs Super Humanizer
Super Humanizer finished 10.1 points ahead of NoteGPT in the July 2026 cycle, 54.13 to 44.04, ranking #11 against #13 in a field of 13. Super Humanizer scored higher on 5 of 5 detectors and 6 of 7 writing categories. NoteGPT came out ahead on penalties (None vs −5.0), consistency across categories (100.0 vs 72.0) and readability (74.5 vs 67.1).
- Detectors
- 0 – 5
- Categories
- 1 – 6
- Components
- 3 – 2
Score components
What the overall score is made of: bypass rate weighs 42%, meaning preservation 32%, readability 16%, consistency across categories 10%. Output-quality penalties come off the total. How scoring works →
CIs overlap marks a gap that sits inside both tools' published 95% confidence intervals for that component; it may not survive another cycle.
Detector by detector
Share of each tool's outputs that a detector classified as human-written. Super Humanizer took 5 of 5.
Writing categories
Category score per writing context: bypass credit only for real rewrites, blended with the category's own meaning preservation and readability. Small categories swing; the prompt count is shown on each row. How category scores work →
Head-to-head history
Overall score in every cycle both tools were tested. Super Humanizer has finished ahead in 2 of 2 shared cycles.
| Cycle | NoteGPT | Super Humanizer | Margin |
|---|---|---|---|
| July 2026 | 44.04 #13 | 54.13 #11 | → 10.1 |
| June 2026 | 45.34 #13 | 64.75 #11 | → 19.4 |
Where each one wins
Every measure above that one tool won outright, largest margin first within each group.
NoteGPT
4 wins- Penalties Score None vs −5.0
- Consistency Score 100.0 vs 72.0
- Readability Score 74.5 vs 67.1
- Business Email Category 45.9 vs 39.2
Super Humanizer
13 wins- Bypass rate Score 42.3 vs 0.0
- Meaning preservation Score 73.2 vs 69.1
- Copyleaks Detector 48.2 vs 0.0
- Originality.ai Detector 34.6 vs 0.1
- GPTZero Detector 34.0 vs 0.0
- Winston AI Detector 31.5 vs 0.2
- ZeroGPT Detector 73.3 vs 64.6
- Discussion Board Category 65.7 vs 35.0
- Academic Essay Category 52.0 vs 33.9
- Blog Post Category 55.4 vs 39.8
- and 3 more
Questions people ask
Is NoteGPT better than Super Humanizer?
Super Humanizer finished 10.1 points ahead of NoteGPT in the July 2026 cycle, 54.13 to 44.04, ranking #11 against #13 in a field of 13. Super Humanizer scored higher on 5 of 5 detectors and 6 of 7 writing categories. Both tools ran the same 33 prompts, scored by the same 5 detectors, under methodology v1.2.0; every input, output and verdict is published.
Which bypasses AI detectors better, NoteGPT or Super Humanizer?
Super Humanizer posted the higher bypass rate, 42.3 vs 0.0, and scored higher on 5 of 5 detectors. Super Humanizer led on GPTZero, Originality.ai, Copyleaks, Winston AI and ZeroGPT.
Do NoteGPT and Super Humanizer keep the original meaning?
Super Humanizer preserved meaning better, 73.2 vs 69.1 on our 0–100 similarity scale, though the confidence intervals overlap. On readability, NoteGPT rated higher, 74.5 vs 67.1. Penalties this cycle: NoteGPT None, Super Humanizer −5.0.