Head to head · September 2026 cycle
StealthBypass vs WriteHuman
WriteHuman finished 38.9 points ahead of StealthBypass in the September 2026 cycle, 78.29 to 39.38, ranking #1 against #13 in a field of 14. WriteHuman scored higher on 4 of 5 detectors and 7 of 7 writing categories. StealthBypass came out ahead on ZeroGPT (84.4 vs 77.8). The bypass-rate gap, 78.6 to 90.1, sits inside both tools' 95% confidence intervals, so treat bypass as a draw.
- Detectors
- 1 – 4
- Categories
- 0 – 7
- Components
- 0 – 5
33 prompts · Last tested · Methodology v1.2.0
Score components
What the overall score is made of: bypass rate weighs 42%, meaning preservation 32%, readability 16%, consistency across categories 10%. Output-quality penalties come off the total. How scoring works →
CIs overlap marks a gap that sits inside both tools' published 95% confidence intervals for that component; it may not survive another cycle.
Detector by detector
Share of each tool's outputs that a detector classified as human-written. WriteHuman took 4 of 5.
Writing categories
Category score per writing context: bypass credit only for real rewrites, blended with the category's own meaning preservation and readability. Small categories swing; the prompt count is shown on each row. How category scores work →
Where each one wins
Every measure above that one tool won outright, largest margin first within each group.
StealthBypass
1 win- ZeroGPT Detector 84.4 vs 77.8
WriteHuman
16 wins- Penalties Score None vs −23.0
- Meaning preservation Score 72.3 vs 39.5
- Bypass rate Score 90.1 vs 78.6
- Readability Score 56.9 vs 54.1
- Consistency Score 82.1 vs 80.7
- Originality.ai Detector 91.4 vs 58.5
- Winston AI Detector 84.1 vs 56.3
- Copyleaks Detector 86.7 vs 65.1
- GPTZero Detector 71.8 vs 69.3
- Marketing Copy Category 82.1 vs 18.9
- and 6 more
Same prompt, both outputs
Both tools were given this AI-written passage in the September 2026 cycle. Below it is what each one returned. This prompt was picked by a fixed rule, not by how the tools scored.
AI-written input
Every tool on this prompt →News Article · News Article · written by Claude Sonnet 5 · 405 words
# Screen Time and Teen Mental Health: What New Research Reveals
A growing body of research is deepening the conversation around adolescent screen use, as parents, educators, and policymakers grapple with how smartphones and social media affect young people's psychological wellbeing.
Recent studies from public health researchers suggest the relationship between screen time and mental health is more nuanced than early alarmist narratives suggested, though concerns remain substantial. Data collected from adolescents aged 13 to 17 indicates that heavy social media use—particularly platforms emphasizing image sharing and social comparison—correlates with increased rates of anxiety, depression, and body image concerns, especially among teenage girls.
"It's not simply about hours spent on a screen," said Dr. Elena Vasquez, a developmental psychologist who studies digital media's impact on youth. "What matters more is the type of engagement. Passive scrolling through curated content tends to correlate with worse outcomes than active communication with friends or creative content creation."
The findings echo a 2023 U.S. Surgeon General advisory that flagged social media as a potential contributor to the youth mental health crisis, calling for further research while urging tech companies to implement stronger safeguards for younger users.
Several states have responded with legislation. Utah, Arkansas, and Louisiana have passed laws requiring age verification and parental consent for minors using social media platforms, while other states are considering restricting phone use in schools altogether. Florida recently banned social media accounts for children under 14.
Critics of screen-time restrictions argue that oversimplified messaging risks ignoring underlying factors—such as academic pressure, family dynamics, and socioeconomic stress—that also drive adolescent mental health struggles. Some researchers caution against treating all screen time equally, noting that video calls with distant relatives or educational content differ meaningfully from doomscrolling.
Schools are experimenting with their own approaches. Districts in California, New York, and Texas have implemented phone-free classroom policies, reporting anecdotal improvements in student attention and peer interaction.
Mental health advocates emphasize that solutions likely require a multi-pronged approach. "We need better digital literacy education, more parental engagement, and platform accountability," said Marcus Chen, director of a nonprofit focused on youth digital wellness. "Simply banning devices won't address the root causes of why teens turn to screens in the first place—often loneliness or a desire for connection."
As research continues, experts agree on one point: adolescence remains a critical period for brain development, making the stakes of digital habits formed during these years particularly significant for long-term wellbeing.
Show the full input Show less
13 words (input 405)
# Screen Time and Adolescent Well-Being: New Research Sheds Light on Complex Link
- GPTZero0.55passed
- ZeroGPT1.00passed
- Originality.ai0.12caught
Passed 2 of 3 detectors. 2 of the 5 returned no verdict.
Every StealthBypass run in September 2026 →503 words (input 405)
Screen Time and Teen Mental Health: What New Research Shows
Research on screen use by teens has proliferated as parents, teachers, and legislators attempt to understand the consequences of cell phone and social media use on the psychological well-being of teens.
Public health researchers have published studies that have advanced the discussion on the screen time/mental health relationship beyond the early, sensationalized reports. Concerns about social media and mental health have continued to increase. Research looking at teens ages 13 to 17 has found that using social media that focuses on sharing images and other social media that promotes social comparison increases the risk of anxiety, depression, and body image concerns, especially for teen girls.
Dr. Elena Vasquez, a developmental psychologist who studies digital media and teens, said, "It's not simply about hours spent on a screen. What is more important is the quality of the engagement. Passive social media use, like scrolling, can be harmful, but so can social media use that is used for social communication with friends or for creative social media posts."
The Surgeon General's 2023 advisory, which focused on the youth mental health crisis, supported the need for more research on social media and raised concerns about the existing social media platforms and their neglection of protecting youth users.
Some states have passed legislation. Utah, Arkansas, and Louisiana have passed laws requiring social media platforms to obtain age verification and parental consent for underage users. Other states are considering banning cell phone use in schools. Florida passed a law that prohibits social media use for kids under 14.
Those against limiting screen time say that overly simple messages about the issue ignore the other stressors on teens, like the pressure to perform academically, their family situation, and the financial situation of their family. Some researchers say that all screen time should not be lumped together. They say that video calling relatives or using screen time for educational purposes is not the same as doom scrolling.
Different approaches to the issue are being taken by different schools. Some districts in California, New York, and Texas have banned cell phone use during the school day, with some reportings of better student attention and peer interaction.
Advocates for teen mental health say that there will need to be multiple changes to the situation to help. Marcus Chen, the director of a teen digital wellness nonprofit, said "We need better digital literacy education, more parental engagement, and platform accountability." Chen also said that a ban on electronic devices would not solve the problem of teens using their devices to communicate with their friends because 'simply banning devices' would not solve the problem of 'teens turning to screens' because of loneliness.
All of the researchers say that there is not enough information to fully understand the effects of having teens use electronic devices, but they all say that the teen years are important for brain development, and that teen digital habits should be researched because it could affect their long term mental health.
Show the full output Show less
- GPTZero0.00caught
- Winston AI0.66passed
- ZeroGPT1.00passed
- Copyleaks1.00passed
- Originality.ai1.00passed
Passed 4 of 5 detectors.
Every WriteHuman run in September 2026 →Each chip is one detector's score for that output, from 0 (AI) to 1 (human). A score of 0.50 or higher counts as a pass and shows green; below that the detector caught it and the chip shows red.
Questions people ask
Is StealthBypass better than WriteHuman?
WriteHuman finished 38.9 points ahead of StealthBypass in the September 2026 cycle, 78.29 to 39.38, ranking #1 against #13 in a field of 14. WriteHuman scored higher on 4 of 5 detectors and 7 of 7 writing categories. Both tools ran the same 33 prompts, scored by the same 5 detectors, under methodology v1.2.0; every input, output and verdict is published.
Which bypasses AI detectors better, StealthBypass or WriteHuman?
WriteHuman posted the higher bypass rate, 90.1 vs 78.6, and scored higher on 4 of 5 detectors. StealthBypass led on ZeroGPT; WriteHuman led on GPTZero, Originality.ai, Copyleaks and Winston AI. The overall bypass gap is inside both 95% confidence intervals, so it is not a reliable difference.
Do StealthBypass and WriteHuman keep the original meaning?
WriteHuman preserved meaning better, 72.3 vs 39.5 on our 0–100 similarity scale. On readability, WriteHuman rated higher, 56.9 vs 54.1. Penalties this cycle: StealthBypass −23.0, WriteHuman None.