Head to head · September 2026 cycle
Super Humanizer vs SupWriter
SupWriter finished 11.8 points ahead of Super Humanizer in the September 2026 cycle, 72.80 to 60.97, ranking #5 against #11 in a field of 14. SupWriter scored higher on 4 of 5 detectors and 6 of 7 writing categories. Super Humanizer came out ahead on GPTZero (54.6 vs 21.0), business email prompts (53.7 vs 38.7) and readability (52.1 vs 45.7). The bypass-rate gap, 64.4 to 80.3, sits inside both tools' 95% confidence intervals, so treat bypass as a draw.
- Detectors
- 1 – 4
- Categories
- 1 – 6
- Components
- 2 – 3
Score components
What the overall score is made of: bypass rate weighs 42%, meaning preservation 32%, readability 16%, consistency across categories 10%. Output-quality penalties come off the total. How scoring works →
CIs overlap marks a gap that sits inside both tools' published 95% confidence intervals for that component; it may not survive another cycle.
Detector by detector
Share of each tool's outputs that a detector classified as human-written. SupWriter took 4 of 5.
Writing categories
Category score per writing context: bypass credit only for real rewrites, blended with the category's own meaning preservation and readability. Small categories swing; the prompt count is shown on each row. How category scores work →
Where each one wins
Every measure above that one tool won outright, largest margin first within each group.
Super Humanizer
4 wins- Readability Score 52.1 vs 45.7
- Consistency Score 68.5 vs 64.7
- GPTZero Detector 54.6 vs 21.0
- Business Email Category 53.7 vs 38.7
SupWriter
13 wins- Penalties Score None vs −5.0
- Bypass rate Score 80.3 vs 64.4
- Meaning preservation Score 79.0 vs 74.2
- Winston AI Detector 81.5 vs 52.2
- Copyleaks Detector 85.3 vs 63.7
- Originality.ai Detector 78.5 vs 71.0
- ZeroGPT Detector 77.9 vs 76.9
- Marketing Copy Category 81.3 vs 51.2
- Academic Essay Category 79.7 vs 55.2
- Blog Post Category 78.4 vs 58.8
- and 3 more
Questions people ask
Is Super Humanizer better than SupWriter?
SupWriter finished 11.8 points ahead of Super Humanizer in the September 2026 cycle, 72.80 to 60.97, ranking #5 against #11 in a field of 14. SupWriter scored higher on 4 of 5 detectors and 6 of 7 writing categories. Both tools ran the same 33 prompts, scored by the same 5 detectors, under methodology v1.2.0; every input, output and verdict is published.
Which bypasses AI detectors better, Super Humanizer or SupWriter?
SupWriter posted the higher bypass rate, 80.3 vs 64.4, and scored higher on 4 of 5 detectors. Super Humanizer led on GPTZero; SupWriter led on Originality.ai, Copyleaks, Winston AI and ZeroGPT. The overall bypass gap is inside both 95% confidence intervals, so it is not a reliable difference.
Do Super Humanizer and SupWriter keep the original meaning?
SupWriter preserved meaning better, 79.0 vs 74.2 on our 0–100 similarity scale, though the confidence intervals overlap. On readability, Super Humanizer rated higher, 52.1 vs 45.7. Penalties this cycle: Super Humanizer −5.0, SupWriter None.