Skip to content
The September 2026 results are in: WriteHuman holds #1, and newcomer SupWriter debuts at #5.Read the full analysis →
HumanizerBench

Head to head · September 2026 cycle

SupWriter vs Walter Writes

SupWriter finished 11.1 points ahead of Walter Writes in the September 2026 cycle, 72.80 to 61.70, ranking #5 against #10 in a field of 14. SupWriter scored higher on 3 of 5 detectors and 6 of 7 writing categories. Walter Writes came out ahead on GPTZero (78.3 vs 21.0), business email prompts (54.1 vs 38.7) and readability (60.4 vs 45.7). The bypass-rate gap, 80.3 to 83.9, sits inside both tools' 95% confidence intervals, so treat bypass as a draw.

72.80 /100
overall score
#5 /14
rank -
+11.10
← SupWriter leads
Detectors
3 2
Categories
6 1
Components
2 3
61.70 /100
overall score
#10 /14
rank ▼ 1
Last tested
Prompts
33
Methodology
v1.2.0

Score components

What the overall score is made of: bypass rate weighs 42%, meaning preservation 32%, readability 16%, consistency across categories 10%. Output-quality penalties come off the total. How scoring works →

Bypass rate CIs overlap Walter Writes by 3.6
80.3 83.9
Meaning preservation SupWriter by 12.4
79.0 66.6
Readability Walter Writes by 14.7
45.7 60.4
Consistency Walter Writes by 10.2
64.7 74.9
Penalties fewer is better SupWriter by 12.0
None −12.0

CIs overlap marks a gap that sits inside both tools' published 95% confidence intervals for that component; it may not survive another cycle.

Detector by detector

Share of each tool's outputs that a detector classified as human-written. SupWriter took 3 of 5.

GPTZero Walter Writes by 57.4
21.0 78.3
Originality.ai Walter Writes by 6.0
78.5 84.5
Copyleaks SupWriter by 26.2
85.3 59.1
Winston AI SupWriter by 14.5
81.5 67.0
ZeroGPT SupWriter by 1.9
77.9 76.0

Writing categories

Category score per writing context: bypass credit only for real rewrites, blended with the category's own meaning preservation and readability. Small categories swing; the prompt count is shown on each row. How category scores work →

Academic Essay Application Essay Blog Post Business Email Marketing Copy Discussion Board News Article Academic Essay: SupWriter 79.7 · Walter Writes 47.9 Application Essay: SupWriter 67.1 · Walter Writes 57.3 Blog Post: SupWriter 78.4 · Walter Writes 70.8 Business Email: SupWriter 38.7 · Walter Writes 54.1 Marketing Copy: SupWriter 81.3 · Walter Writes 45.3 Discussion Board: SupWriter 78.0 · Walter Writes 74.4 News Article: SupWriter 81.1 · Walter Writes 49.8
SupWriter Walter Writes Outer ring = 100
Academic Essay 6 prompts SupWriter by 31.8
79.7 47.9
Application Essay 6 prompts SupWriter by 9.8
67.1 57.3
Blog Post 6 prompts SupWriter by 7.7
78.4 70.8
Business Email 3 prompts Walter Writes by 15.4
38.7 54.1
Marketing Copy 6 prompts SupWriter by 36.0
81.3 45.3
Discussion Board 3 prompts SupWriter by 3.6
78.0 74.4
News Article 3 prompts SupWriter by 31.2
81.1 49.8

Where each one wins

Every measure above that one tool won outright, largest margin first within each group.

SupWriter

11 wins
  • Penalties Score None vs −12.0
  • Meaning preservation Score 79.0 vs 66.6
  • Copyleaks Detector 85.3 vs 59.1
  • Winston AI Detector 81.5 vs 67.0
  • ZeroGPT Detector 77.9 vs 76.0
  • Marketing Copy Category 81.3 vs 45.3
  • Academic Essay Category 79.7 vs 47.9
  • News Article Category 81.1 vs 49.8
  • Application Essay Category 67.1 vs 57.3
  • Blog Post Category 78.4 vs 70.8
  • and 1 more

Walter Writes

6 wins
  • Readability Score 60.4 vs 45.7
  • Consistency Score 74.9 vs 64.7
  • Bypass rate Score 83.9 vs 80.3
  • GPTZero Detector 78.3 vs 21.0
  • Originality.ai Detector 84.5 vs 78.5
  • Business Email Category 54.1 vs 38.7

Questions people ask

Is SupWriter better than Walter Writes?

SupWriter finished 11.1 points ahead of Walter Writes in the September 2026 cycle, 72.80 to 61.70, ranking #5 against #10 in a field of 14. SupWriter scored higher on 3 of 5 detectors and 6 of 7 writing categories. Both tools ran the same 33 prompts, scored by the same 5 detectors, under methodology v1.2.0; every input, output and verdict is published.

Which bypasses AI detectors better, SupWriter or Walter Writes?

Walter Writes posted the higher bypass rate, 83.9 vs 80.3, and scored higher on 2 of 5 detectors. SupWriter led on Copyleaks, Winston AI and ZeroGPT; Walter Writes led on GPTZero and Originality.ai. The overall bypass gap is inside both 95% confidence intervals, so it is not a reliable difference.

Do SupWriter and Walter Writes keep the original meaning?

SupWriter preserved meaning better, 79.0 vs 66.6 on our 0–100 similarity scale. On readability, Walter Writes rated higher, 60.4 vs 45.7. Penalties this cycle: SupWriter None, Walter Writes −12.0.