Head to head · October 2026 cycle
Clever AI Humanizer vs Phrasly
Clever AI Humanizer finished 7.2 points ahead of Phrasly in the October 2026 cycle, 69.02 to 61.79, ranking #4 against #12 in a field of 14. Clever AI Humanizer scored higher on 1 of 6 detectors and 5 of 6 writing categories. Phrasly came out ahead on Pangram (85.6 vs 26.5), ZeroGPT (94.3 vs 76.9) and bypass rate (95.3 vs 80.1).
- Detectors
- 1 – 5
- Categories
- 5 – 1
- Components
- 3 – 2
30 prompts · Last tested · Methodology v1.3.0
Score components
What the overall score is made of: bypass rate weighs 42%, meaning preservation 32%, readability 16%, consistency across categories 10%. Output-quality penalties come off the total. How scoring works →
CIs overlap marks a gap that sits inside both tools' published 95% confidence intervals for that component; it may not survive another cycle.
Detector by detector
Share of each tool's outputs that a detector classified as human-written. Phrasly took 5 of 6.
Writing categories
Category score per writing context: bypass credit only for real rewrites, blended with the category's own meaning preservation and readability. Small categories swing; the prompt count is shown on each row. How category scores work →
Where each one wins
Every measure above that one tool won outright, largest margin first within each group.
Clever AI Humanizer
9 wins- Penalties Score −4.0 vs −11.0
- Readability Score 68.6 vs 44.2
- Meaning preservation Score 59.5 vs 49.9
- Originality.ai Detector 97.1 vs 96.6
- News Article Category 73.1 vs 16.8
- Marketing Copy Category 72.0 vs 45.8
- Application Essay Category 70.9 vs 63.6
- Blog Post Category 62.7 vs 57.8
- Academic Essay Category 65.5 vs 63.7
Phrasly
8 wins- Bypass rate Score 95.3 vs 80.1
- Consistency Score 96.9 vs 93.6
- Pangram Detector 85.6 vs 26.5
- ZeroGPT Detector 94.3 vs 76.9
- GPTZero Detector 98.6 vs 91.4
- Winston AI Detector 97.0 vs 91.8
- Copyleaks Detector 100.0 vs 96.7
- Discussion Board Category 52.9 vs 39.5
Same prompt, both outputs
Both tools were given this AI-written passage in the October 2026 cycle. Below it is what each one returned. This prompt was picked by a fixed rule, not by how the tools scored.
AI-written input
Every tool on this prompt →Discussion Post · Discussion Board · written by claude-sonnet-5-5 · 274 words
Communities should treat public art and infrastructure as complementary investments rather than competitors, while still giving priority to safety and basic function when budgets are tight.
Start with the principle that essential infrastructure comes first. Water systems, roads, bridges, and emergency services protect lives and underpin economic activity. When a community faces deferred maintenance or safety hazards, diverting money to art is hard to justify. Residents rightly expect core services before embellishments.
That said, art is not a frivolous add-on. Research and local experience show that public art can strengthen identity, attract visitors, support local artists, and make neighborhoods feel cared for. The most effective approach is integration. Many cities adopt "percent for art" policies, setting aside one to two percent of capital project budgets for artistic elements. This keeps art spending proportional, ties it to projects already underway, and avoids pitting it directly against repair needs. A new bridge, transit station, or plaza can include thoughtful design at modest marginal cost.
Transparency and public participation also matter. Communities should involve residents in deciding what gets funded, using open budget hearings and clear criteria. People are more supportive of art when it reflects local history and values, and when they see infrastructure needs being met first.
Finally, diversify funding. Grants, private donations, business sponsorships, and arts endowments can finance projects without drawing on road or utility budgets. Temporary installations and community murals offer low-cost options.
In short, fund essentials reliably, embed art in capital projects through small set-asides, seek outside money, and let residents help set priorities. This balance respects both practical needs and the cultural life that makes a place worth living in.
Show the full input Show less
241 words (input 274)
If you have to choose between funding art or fixing up water treatment plants, bridges, and emergency services, you pick the latter. Residents should get the basic necessities first and foremost. That does not mean art isn't important, but it should be held off of until the essentials are taken care of.
Art does not come cheap, but according to a study and community experience, art can bring a community together, create a positive image, attract people to your area, and give local artists a nice source of income. The best way to fund art is to put it aside one to two percent in big projects like roads, bridges, and transit systems. This allows art to be put into an area without having to fight a bigger budget for something more necessary. New buildings, roads, and transit systems could also be slightly nicer to look at for a small price.
The art funded should also be transparent and allow the community to vote on what is and is not approved. People are more likely to support art that brings value and history to a place, and knows that if they don't approve a bill, their voice is being heard. Having the essentials taken care of is crucial for any area.
To sum it all up, fund the essentials, fund small percentages for bigger projects, allow outside funding, and have transparency. Art is important, but not when the water won't work.
Show the full output Show less
- GPTZero1.00passed
- Pangram1.00passed
- Winston AI1.00passed
- ZeroGPT1.00passed
- Copyleaks1.00passed
- Originality.ai1.00passed
Passed 6 of 6 detectors.
Every Clever AI Humanizer run in October 2026 →284 words (input 274)
When communities need to decide between funding public works vs art there should be some room for both. Always have public works take precedence. There are things in life we all need water, transportation, public safety etc. So its difficult to argue why your city or town should spend money on public art if your water lines are old. Its important to keep your basic needs met before you go into luxury. Public Art is an great addition to any community. Many towns and cities will put out public funds to paint buildings or create installations for public display. They use this as an opportunity to help out the art community within their area as well as draw attention to there city. One option for cities to invest in public art is to dedicate 1-2% of their budget to art. This allows them to build something beautiful around the work they're already doing. By dedicating a small percentage of their public funds they can allow art to flourish but not have it compete with their need for repairs or better working systems. Always have the citizens involved. Have them see what can be done with their money and how its being spent. If they know what your doing with their tax dollars they'll be happier about you adding more art around there town or city. Find ways to invest in public art with no additional funds from public works. There are grants that can be given for certain types of art and can help the city without them having to spend money on there public works system. You can also always find ways to do cheaper art such as murals or small public installations.
Show the full output Show less
- GPTZero1.00passed
- Pangram1.00passed
- Winston AI1.00passed
- ZeroGPT1.00passed
- Copyleaks1.00passed
- Originality.ai1.00passed
Passed 6 of 6 detectors.
Every Phrasly run in October 2026 →Each chip is one detector's score for that output, from 0 (AI) to 1 (human). A score of 0.50 or higher counts as a pass and shows green; below that the detector caught it and the chip shows red.
Questions people ask
Is Clever AI Humanizer better than Phrasly?
Clever AI Humanizer finished 7.2 points ahead of Phrasly in the October 2026 cycle, 69.02 to 61.79, ranking #4 against #12 in a field of 14. Clever AI Humanizer scored higher on 1 of 6 detectors and 5 of 6 writing categories. Both tools ran the same 30 prompts, scored by the same 6 detectors, under methodology v1.3.0; every input, output and verdict is published.
Which bypasses AI detectors better, Clever AI Humanizer or Phrasly?
Phrasly posted the higher bypass rate, 95.3 vs 80.1, and scored higher on 5 of 6 detectors. Clever AI Humanizer led on Originality.ai; Phrasly led on GPTZero, Copyleaks, Winston AI, ZeroGPT and Pangram.
Do Clever AI Humanizer and Phrasly keep the original meaning?
Clever AI Humanizer preserved meaning better, 59.5 vs 49.9 on our 0–100 similarity scale, though the confidence intervals overlap. On readability, Clever AI Humanizer rated higher, 68.6 vs 44.2. Penalties this cycle: Clever AI Humanizer −4.0, Phrasly −11.0.