Head to head · July 2026 cycle
NoteGPT vs WriteHuman
WriteHuman finished 29.0 points ahead of NoteGPT in the July 2026 cycle, 73.07 to 44.04, ranking #1 against #13 in a field of 13. WriteHuman scored higher on 5 of 5 detectors and 7 of 7 writing categories. NoteGPT came out ahead on consistency across categories (100.0 vs 74.8), readability (74.5 vs 56.2) and penalties (None vs −1.0).
- Detectors
- 0 – 5
- Categories
- 0 – 7
- Components
- 3 – 2
Score components
What the overall score is made of: bypass rate weighs 42%, meaning preservation 32%, readability 16%, consistency across categories 10%. Output-quality penalties come off the total. How scoring works →
CIs overlap marks a gap that sits inside both tools' published 95% confidence intervals for that component; it may not survive another cycle.
Detector by detector
Share of each tool's outputs that a detector classified as human-written. WriteHuman took 5 of 5.
Writing categories
Category score per writing context: bypass credit only for real rewrites, blended with the category's own meaning preservation and readability. Small categories swing; the prompt count is shown on each row. How category scores work →
Head-to-head history
Overall score in every cycle both tools were tested. WriteHuman has finished ahead in 2 of 2 shared cycles.
| Cycle | NoteGPT | WriteHuman | Margin |
|---|---|---|---|
| July 2026 | 44.04 #13 | 73.07 #1 | → 29.0 |
| June 2026 | 45.34 #13 | 83.59 #2 | → 38.3 |
Where each one wins
Every measure above that one tool won outright, largest margin first within each group.
NoteGPT
3 wins- Consistency Score 100.0 vs 74.8
- Readability Score 74.5 vs 56.2
- Penalties Score None vs −1.0
WriteHuman
14 wins- Bypass rate Score 81.6 vs 0.0
- Meaning preservation Score 72.9 vs 69.1
- Winston AI Detector 86.2 vs 0.2
- Copyleaks Detector 61.0 vs 0.0
- GPTZero Detector 60.8 vs 0.0
- Originality.ai Detector 53.5 vs 0.1
- ZeroGPT Detector 88.6 vs 64.6
- Academic Essay Category 78.3 vs 33.9
- Discussion Board Category 79.2 vs 35.0
- Blog Post Category 79.7 vs 39.8
- and 4 more
Questions people ask
Is NoteGPT better than WriteHuman?
WriteHuman finished 29.0 points ahead of NoteGPT in the July 2026 cycle, 73.07 to 44.04, ranking #1 against #13 in a field of 13. WriteHuman scored higher on 5 of 5 detectors and 7 of 7 writing categories. Both tools ran the same 33 prompts, scored by the same 5 detectors, under methodology v1.2.0; every input, output and verdict is published.
Which bypasses AI detectors better, NoteGPT or WriteHuman?
WriteHuman posted the higher bypass rate, 81.6 vs 0.0, and scored higher on 5 of 5 detectors. WriteHuman led on GPTZero, Originality.ai, Copyleaks, Winston AI and ZeroGPT.
Do NoteGPT and WriteHuman keep the original meaning?
WriteHuman preserved meaning better, 72.9 vs 69.1 on our 0–100 similarity scale, though the confidence intervals overlap. On readability, NoteGPT rated higher, 74.5 vs 56.2. Penalties this cycle: NoteGPT None, WriteHuman −1.0.