Skip to content
October 2026 results: WriteHuman holds #1, StealthGPT jumps to #2. Read the analysis →
HumanizerBench

Head to head · October 2026 cycle

Phrasly vs Super Humanizer

Super Humanizer finished 5.8 points ahead of Phrasly in the October 2026 cycle, 67.58 to 61.79, ranking #7 against #12 in a field of 14. Super Humanizer scored higher on 0 of 6 detectors and 6 of 6 writing categories. Phrasly came out ahead on Pangram (85.6 vs 0.0), GPTZero (98.6 vs 46.6) and bypass rate (95.3 vs 61.8).

61.79 /100
overall score
#12 /14
rank ▼ 4
+5.79
Super Humanizer leads →
Detectors
6 – 0
Categories
0 – 6
Components
2 – 3
67.58 /100
overall score
#7 /14
rank ▲ 4

30 prompts · Last tested · Methodology v1.3.0

Score components

What the overall score is made of: bypass rate weighs 42%, meaning preservation 32%, readability 16%, consistency across categories 10%. Output-quality penalties come off the total. How scoring works →

Bypass rate Phrasly by 33.5
95.3 61.8
Meaning preservation Super Humanizer by 26.7
49.9 76.6
Readability Super Humanizer by 12.4
44.2 56.6
Consistency Phrasly by 6.5
96.9 90.4
Penalties fewer is better Super Humanizer by 10.0
−11.0 −1.0

Detector by detector

Share of each tool's outputs that a detector classified as human-written. Phrasly took 6 of 6.

GPTZero Phrasly by 52.0
98.6 46.6
Originality.ai Phrasly by 1.5
96.6 95.0
Copyleaks Phrasly by 16.7
100.0 83.3
Winston AI Phrasly by 19.1
97.0 77.9
ZeroGPT Phrasly by 26.3
94.3 68.0
Pangram Phrasly by 85.6
85.6 0.0

Writing categories

Category score per writing context: bypass credit only for real rewrites, blended with the category's own meaning preservation and readability. Small categories swing; the prompt count is shown on each row. How category scores work →

Academic Essay Application Essay Blog Post Marketing Copy Discussion Board News Article Academic Essay: Phrasly 63.7 · Super Humanizer 67.4 Application Essay: Phrasly 63.6 · Super Humanizer 64.4 Blog Post: Phrasly 57.8 · Super Humanizer 70.3 Marketing Copy: Phrasly 45.8 · Super Humanizer 55.4 Discussion Board: Phrasly 52.9 · Super Humanizer 66.0 News Article: Phrasly 16.8 · Super Humanizer 70.7
Phrasly Super Humanizer Outer ring = 100
Academic Essay 6 prompts Super Humanizer by 3.7
63.7 67.4
Application Essay 6 prompts Super Humanizer by 0.7
63.6 64.4
Blog Post 6 prompts Super Humanizer by 12.6
57.8 70.3
Marketing Copy 6 prompts Super Humanizer by 9.6
45.8 55.4
Discussion Board 3 prompts Super Humanizer by 13.1
52.9 66.0
News Article 3 prompts Super Humanizer by 53.9
16.8 70.7

Head-to-head history

Overall score in every cycle both tools were tested. Phrasly has finished ahead in 4 of 5 shared cycles.

50 60 70 80 June 2026 July 2026 August 2026 September 2026 October 2026 June 2026: Super Humanizer 64.75 (#11) June 2026: Phrasly 71.10 (#8) July 2026: Super Humanizer 54.13 (#11) July 2026: Phrasly 61.47 (#9) August 2026: Super Humanizer 55.86 (#10) August 2026: Phrasly 63.30 (#7) September 2026: Super Humanizer 60.97 (#11) September 2026: Phrasly 67.58 (#8) October 2026: Super Humanizer 67.58 (#7) October 2026: Phrasly 61.79 (#12) 61.8 67.6
Phrasly Super Humanizer
Cycle Phrasly Super Humanizer Margin
October 2026 61.79 #12 67.58 #7 → 5.8
September 2026 67.58 #8 60.97 #11 ← 6.6
August 2026 63.30 #7 55.86 #10 ← 7.4
July 2026 61.47 #9 54.13 #11 ← 7.3
June 2026 71.10 #8 64.75 #11 ← 6.3

Where each one wins

Every measure above that one tool won outright, largest margin first within each group.

Phrasly

8 wins
  • Bypass rate Score 95.3 vs 61.8
  • Consistency Score 96.9 vs 90.4
  • Pangram Detector 85.6 vs 0.0
  • GPTZero Detector 98.6 vs 46.6
  • ZeroGPT Detector 94.3 vs 68.0
  • Winston AI Detector 97.0 vs 77.9
  • Copyleaks Detector 100.0 vs 83.3
  • Originality.ai Detector 96.6 vs 95.0

Super Humanizer

9 wins
  • Penalties Score −1.0 vs −11.0
  • Meaning preservation Score 76.6 vs 49.9
  • Readability Score 56.6 vs 44.2
  • News Article Category 70.7 vs 16.8
  • Discussion Board Category 66.0 vs 52.9
  • Blog Post Category 70.3 vs 57.8
  • Marketing Copy Category 55.4 vs 45.8
  • Academic Essay Category 67.4 vs 63.7
  • Application Essay Category 64.4 vs 63.6

Same prompt, both outputs

Both tools were given this AI-written passage in the October 2026 cycle. Below it is what each one returned. This prompt was picked by a fixed rule, not by how the tools scored.

Cover Letter · Application Essay · written by gemini-3-8-flash · 369 words

[Your Name] [Your Phone Number] | [Your Email Address] [Your Portfolio/Vimeo Link] | [Your Location]

[Date]

[Hiring Manager's Name or Search Committee] [Production Company / Project Name] [Company Address / "Remote"]

Dear [Hiring Manager's Name or "Documentary Production Team"],

I am writing to express my strong interest in the freelance Documentary Editor position for [Project Title or "your upcoming documentary feature"]. Having followed your team's commitment to impactful, character-driven storytelling, I am eager to bring my narrative instincts, technical precision, and passion for non-fiction film to your post-production workflow.

With over [Number] years of experience editing documentary features, shorts, and docuseries, I specialize in transforming hundreds of hours of raw, vérité footage and sprawling interviews into compelling, cohesive three-act structures. I view the documentary editor’s chair as the final rewrite of the script. My approach balances narrative tension and emotional authenticity with rigorous pacing, ensuring the subjects’ genuine voices remain the heartbeat of the film.

Recently, I served as lead editor on *[Title of a Recent Project]*, a [feature/short] documentary exploring [brief topic, e.g., environmental justice / an artist’s legacy]. On this project, I shaped the central narrative arc from over 150 hours of untranscribed footage, designed the temp soundscape, and worked closely with the director to refine the thematic rhythm. The film went on to [mention an achievement, e.g., screen at XYZ Film Festival / secure distribution / achieve strong audience acclaim].

Technically, I am fully equipped for a seamless remote or hybrid workflow. I am an advanced user of Adobe Premiere Pro, DaVinci Resolve, and Avid Media Composer, with extensive experience managing complex multi-cam timelines, archival integration, and offline-to-online finishing pipelines (including roundtripping for color and sound). Beyond the technical execution, my greatest asset is collaboration. Documentary editing is an intimate, iterative process, and I pride myself on being an ego-free creative partner who welcomes feedback, communicates proactively, and solves narrative bottlenecks with patience and resourcefulness.

I would love the opportunity to review your assembly or discuss your vision for [Project Title] in greater detail. Thank you for your time and consideration, and I look forward to the possibility of collaborating to bring this vital story to the screen.

Sincerely,

[Your Name] [Link to Showreel / Website]

Show the full input

299 words (input 369)

[Your Name] [Phone Number] [Email] [Portfolio/Vimeo] [Location] [Date] [Hiring Manager/Search Committee] Production Company / Documentary [Address / "Remote"] Dear Hiring Manager/Search Committee I'm reaching out because I would love to edit your next documentary. As someone who has followed many of your work, I feel that my skill set would be a great fit to assist with the editorial needs of your production. I have been editing documentary features and short form documentaries for the past [x] years. Editing large quantities of interview and verite footage down to three acts that make sense is what I do best. When sitting in the editing chair I believe that you are rewriting the script one last time. This is something that I take very seriously and will continue to think about each cut I make. Always trying to keep balance between story and how your subject feels. I recently edited *[Insert recent project here]* which was a [short/feature] about [what your project was about]. During my time on this film I helped shape the story using [amount] hours of dialogue that we had never transcribed. I also created our temp music and sound. We went on to... *You can add more bullets if needed* As for software I know my way around Adobe Premiere Pro, Davinci Resolve and Avid. All of which can be operated remotely. Editing will require you to be able to communicate with others, whether it be the Director or another department. Editing documentaries is very hands on and you should always be able to receive critique. That's why communication is important to me. I am confident that I could be an asset to your team. If you would like to see any footage I have put together please feel free to check out my showreel below. [showreel/website]

Show the full output
  • GPTZero1.00passed
  • Pangram0.00caught
  • Winston AI1.00passed
  • ZeroGPT1.00passed
  • Copyleaks1.00passed
  • Originality.ai1.00passed

Passed 5 of 6 detectors.

Every Phrasly run in October 2026 →

356 words (input 369)

[Your Name]

[Your Phone Number] | [Your Email Address] [Your Portfolio/Vimeo Link] | [Your Location]

[Date]

[Hiring Manager's Name or Search Committee]

[Production Company / Project Name]

[Company Address / "Remote"]

Dear [Name of hiring manager or Documentary Production Team],

I am reaching out regarding the freelance Documentary Editor position available with your upcoming documentary feature. I have admired your team's focus on powerful narrative-driven material, and I am excited about the opportunity to contribute my editorial instincts, technical skills and passion for non-fiction filmmaking to your post-production process.

With over [Number] years of editing documentary features, shorts, and docuseries, I work every day to distill hundreds of hours of raw vrit footage and lengthy interviews into tight, three-act packages. The documentary editor's chair is the last rewrite of the script; I am adept at managing narration, emotional truth, and the sit-down to keep the subject's voice front and center while keeping the pace tight.

I recently acted as lead editor on [Title of a Recent Project], a [feature/short] documentary about [short description, e.g., environmental justice / a particular artist's legacy]. I developed the overall story of the film through sourcing and editing over 150 hours of untranscribed footage, conceived the film's temp soundscape, and collaborated with the director to complete the edit and develop the film's thematic rhythm. The film [describe what the film achieved, e.g., screened at XYZ Film Festival / gained distribution / received accolades from audiences].

On paper, I am ready for a smooth remote/hybrid workflow. Adobe Premiere Pro, DaVinci Resolve, Avid Media Composer. I have worked with multi-cam timelines, archival workflows, and offline online finishing roundtrips (for color and sound).

However, my biggest strength is working with others.

Documentary editing is a collaborative, iterative process, and I consider myself an egoless creative partner who takes feedback gracefully, communicates transparently, and tactfully untangles narrative knots with patience and ingenuity.

I would be thrilled to see your assembly or discuss your ideas for [Project Title] more fully. Thanks for your time and consideration, and I look forward to working with you on this important film.

Sincerely,

[Your Name]

[Link to Showreel / Website]

Show the full output
  • GPTZero0.00caught
  • Pangram0.00caught
  • Winston AI0.40caught
  • ZeroGPT0.16caught
  • Copyleaks0.00caught
  • Originality.ai0.93passed

Passed 1 of 6 detectors.

Every Super Humanizer run in October 2026 →

Each chip is one detector's score for that output, from 0 (AI) to 1 (human). A score of 0.50 or higher counts as a pass and shows green; below that the detector caught it and the chip shows red.

Questions people ask

Is Phrasly better than Super Humanizer?

Super Humanizer finished 5.8 points ahead of Phrasly in the October 2026 cycle, 67.58 to 61.79, ranking #7 against #12 in a field of 14. Super Humanizer scored higher on 0 of 6 detectors and 6 of 6 writing categories. Both tools ran the same 30 prompts, scored by the same 6 detectors, under methodology v1.3.0; every input, output and verdict is published.

Which bypasses AI detectors better, Phrasly or Super Humanizer?

Phrasly posted the higher bypass rate, 95.3 vs 61.8, and scored higher on 6 of 6 detectors. Phrasly led on GPTZero, Originality.ai, Copyleaks, Winston AI, ZeroGPT and Pangram.

Do Phrasly and Super Humanizer keep the original meaning?

Super Humanizer preserved meaning better, 76.6 vs 49.9 on our 0–100 similarity scale. On readability, Super Humanizer rated higher, 56.6 vs 44.2. Penalties this cycle: Phrasly −11.0, Super Humanizer −1.0.