Skip to content
October 2026 results: WriteHuman holds #1, StealthGPT jumps to #2. Read the analysis →
HumanizerBench

Best AI Humanizer for Copyleaks

Copyleaks (copyleaks.com) is an enterprise AI checker and plagiarism-detection platform used by universities, businesses, and content-moderation teams. In October 2026, Copyleaks caught 58 of the 420 outputs from the 14 AI humanizers we tested (13.8%), the third lowest catch rate of the six detectors. That is down from 32.9% in September 2026, and ten of the 12 humanizers tested in both months passed it more often. We only test humanized AI text, so this says nothing about how Copyleaks treats human writing.

As of October 2026, StealthGPT and Phrasly are tied as the best AI humanizers for Copyleaks on HumanizerBench, each with the highest average Copyleaks score (100.0), followed by Clever AI Humanizer (96.7).

14 humanizers · 30 prompts each · Last tested · Methodology v1.3.0

Copyleaks catch rate

Copyleaks catch rate by month
Month Rate Caught Outputs Tools Avg score Rank
13.8% 58 420 14 85.9 4 of 6
32.9% 146 444 14 67.3 3 of 5
42.7% 169 396 12 57.2 3 of 5
41.8% 179 428 13 58.1 3 of 5
40.0% 156 390 13 60.1 3 of 5

Swipe the table sideways to see every column.

Caught means Copyleaks gave a human-likelihood score below 0.50 on a 0 to 1 scale. Avg human score is the mean score on a 0 to 100 scale. Rank 1 caught the most that month.

Humanizers that pass Copyleaks

Every AI humanizer we tested against Copyleaks in October 2026, ordered by its average Copyleaks score. 10 of 14 passed Copyleaks on at least 80% of their outputs. The top three passed 30, 30 and 29 of their 30 outputs, and first place changed hands in each of the last 4 monthly updates.

Copyleaks humanizer results, October 2026
Rank

Position by average Copyleaks score this cycle.

Learn more →
Humanizer

Average of Copyleaks's human-likelihood scores on this tool's outputs, where 100 means every output was scored as human. The table is ordered by this column.

Learn more →
↓

Outputs Copyleaks scored as human (a human-likelihood of 0.50 or higher), out of the tool's outputs it scored. Ranked by share passed. Click a count to read this tool's outputs.

Learn more →

This tool's Copyleaks score in September 2026. "New" means it was not tested that month.

Learn more →

Overall score across all detectors, after penalties.

Learn more →
1 100.0 30/30 81.8 74.50
2 100.0 30/30 81.8 61.79
3 96.7 29/30 new 69.02
4 96.7 29/30 81.8 65.98
5 93.3 28/30 86.7 74.89
6 93.3 28/30 new 61.74
7 89.4 26/30 59.1 63.53
8 87.9 27/30 74.3 71.18
9 83.3 25/30 63.7 67.58
10 81.7 25/30 84.9 65.14
11 78.2 23/30 85.3 62.75
12 73.6 23/30 60.6 68.24
13 70.5 21/30 53.5 68.87
14 58.2 18/30 60.3 61.29

Swipe the table sideways to see every column.

Gold, silver and bronze mark the top three in this month's columns, ties sharing a color; Passed is ranked by share of outputs passed.

Copyleaks compared with the other detectors

Copyleaks gave the same verdict as Winston AI most often (84.3% of outputs) and as Pangram least often (31.0%).

The six detectors on the same humanized outputs, October 2026
Detector Caught Rate Avg score vs Sep 2026 Only it Agrees
348 of 420 82.9% 16.9 n/a 147 31.0%
151 of 420 36.0% 61.3 −11.2 1 66.9%
62 of 420 14.8% 76.5 −3.9 0 82.4%
Copyleaks
58 of 420 13.8% 85.9 −19.1 0
48 of 420 11.4% 87.2 −12.1 1 81.4%
30 of 420 7.1% 91.8 −28.3 1 84.3%

Swipe the table sideways to see every column.

Change is in points of catch rate. Only it caught counts outputs no other detector caught, of the 420 all six scored.

What Copyleaks catches

By writing type, Copyleaks caught humanized academic essays most often (21%, 18 of 84) and marketing copy least often (5%, 4 of 84).

Share of humanized outputs caught by writing type, October 2026
Caught by Academic Essay Application Essay Blog Post Discussion Board News Article Marketing Copy
Copyleaks
21% 18/84 19% 16/84 17% 14/84 7% 3/42 7% 3/42 5% 4/84
Other five detectors
28% 118/420 31% 132/420 32% 133/420 31% 66/210 22% 46/210 34% 144/420

Swipe the table sideways to see every column.

The second row pools the other detectors' verdicts on the same outputs. Each type had 3 to 6 prompts this month.

Outputs only Copyleaks caught

No output was caught by Copyleaks alone in October 2026.

Of the 30 prompts, Copyleaks caught the largest share of tools on two prompts, including Argumentative Essay · claude-sonnet-5-5 (7 of 14) and no tool on 11 prompts, including Product Desc · gemini-3-8-flash (0 of 14). All 30 October 2026 prompts

Questions about Copyleaks

Is Copyleaks accurate?

On humanized AI text, Copyleaks has caught between 13.8% (October 2026) and 42.7% (August 2026) of outputs in the five months we have tested it. We only test AI-written passages after a humanizer rewrites them, so we cannot say how often Copyleaks flags human writing by mistake.

Can Copyleaks be bypassed?

In October 2026, 362 of the 420 humanized outputs (86.2%) passed Copyleaks as human-written. It depended on the tool: the 14 humanizers passed it on between 60% and 100% of their outputs.

What is the best AI humanizer for Copyleaks?

As of October 2026, StealthGPT and Phrasly are tied as the best AI humanizers for Copyleaks on HumanizerBench, each with the highest average Copyleaks score (100.0), followed by Clever AI Humanizer (96.7).

How does Copyleaks compare with other AI detectors?

In October 2026, Copyleaks had the third lowest catch rate of the six detectors we test: Pangram 82.9%, GPTZero 36.0%, ZeroGPT 14.8%, Copyleaks 13.8%, Originality.ai 11.4% and Winston AI 7.1%.

What kind of writing does Copyleaks flag most?

Over the five months we have tested it, Copyleaks caught humanized business emails most often (103 of 115, 90%) and discussion board posts least often (34 of 198, 17%).

Other detectors
All detectors GPTZero Originality.ai Winston AI ZeroGPT Pangram
Picking a tool
LeaderboardCompare toolsRankings by use case
Data
October 2026 evidence detector-scores.json Methodology