Skip to content
October 2026 results: WriteHuman holds #1, StealthGPT jumps to #2. Read the analysis →
HumanizerBench

Head to head · October 2026 cycle

Grammarly vs Walter Writes

Walter Writes finished 2.2 points ahead of Grammarly in the October 2026 cycle, 63.53 to 61.29, ranking #10 against #14 in a field of 14. Walter Writes scored higher on 5 of 6 detectors and 3 of 6 writing categories. Grammarly came out ahead on penalties (−3.0 vs −9.0), meaning preservation (85.5 vs 70.4) and discussion board prompts (50.1 vs 37.9).

61.29 /100
overall score
#14 /14
rank ▼ 2
+2.24
Walter Writes leads →
Detectors
0 – 5 (1 tie)
Categories
3 – 3
Components
4 – 1
63.53 /100
overall score
#10 /14
rank -

30 prompts · Last tested · Methodology v1.3.0

Score components

What the overall score is made of: bypass rate weighs 42%, meaning preservation 32%, readability 16%, consistency across categories 10%. Output-quality penalties come off the total. How scoring works →

Bypass rate Walter Writes by 34.6
38.1 72.8
Meaning preservation Grammarly by 15.1
85.5 70.4
Readability Grammarly by 8.7
72.2 63.5
Consistency Grammarly by 0.9
93.6 92.7
Penalties fewer is better Grammarly by 6.0
−3.0 −9.0

Detector by detector

Share of each tool's outputs that a detector classified as human-written. Walter Writes took 5 of 6, with 1 tied.

GPTZero Walter Writes by 84.9
3.0 87.8
Originality.ai Walter Writes by 39.1
52.4 91.5
Copyleaks Walter Writes by 31.1
58.2 89.3
Winston AI Walter Writes by 24.9
71.6 96.5
ZeroGPT Walter Writes by 27.9
43.7 71.6
Pangram Even
0.0 0.0

Writing categories

Category score per writing context: bypass credit only for real rewrites, blended with the category's own meaning preservation and readability. Small categories swing; the prompt count is shown on each row. How category scores work →

Academic Essay Application Essay Blog Post Marketing Copy Discussion Board News Article Academic Essay: Grammarly 61.8 · Walter Writes 71.4 Application Essay: Grammarly 62.3 · Walter Writes 66.1 Blog Post: Grammarly 56.8 · Walter Writes 61.2 Marketing Copy: Grammarly 57.7 · Walter Writes 53.2 Discussion Board: Grammarly 50.1 · Walter Writes 37.9 News Article: Grammarly 68.0 · Walter Writes 56.0
Grammarly Walter Writes Outer ring = 100
Academic Essay 6 prompts Walter Writes by 9.7
61.8 71.4
Application Essay 6 prompts Walter Writes by 3.8
62.3 66.1
Blog Post 6 prompts Walter Writes by 4.4
56.8 61.2
Marketing Copy 6 prompts Grammarly by 4.5
57.7 53.2
Discussion Board 3 prompts Grammarly by 12.2
50.1 37.9
News Article 3 prompts Grammarly by 12.0
68.0 56.0

Head-to-head history

Overall score in every cycle both tools were tested. Walter Writes has finished ahead in 5 of 5 shared cycles.

40 50 60 70 80 June 2026 July 2026 August 2026 September 2026 October 2026 June 2026: Walter Writes 67.24 (#10) June 2026: Grammarly 56.50 (#12) July 2026: Walter Writes 62.84 (#7) July 2026: Grammarly 53.38 (#12) August 2026: Walter Writes 60.83 (#9) August 2026: Grammarly 52.91 (#11) September 2026: Walter Writes 61.70 (#10) September 2026: Grammarly 60.35 (#12) October 2026: Walter Writes 63.53 (#10) October 2026: Grammarly 61.29 (#14) 61.3 63.5
Grammarly Walter Writes
Cycle Grammarly Walter Writes Margin
October 2026 61.29 #14 63.53 #10 → 2.2
September 2026 60.35 #12 61.70 #10 → 1.4
August 2026 52.91 #11 60.83 #9 → 7.9
July 2026 53.38 #12 62.84 #7 → 9.5
June 2026 56.50 #12 67.24 #10 → 10.7

Where each one wins

Every measure above that one tool won outright, largest margin first within each group.

Grammarly

7 wins
  • Penalties Score −3.0 vs −9.0
  • Meaning preservation Score 85.5 vs 70.4
  • Readability Score 72.2 vs 63.5
  • Consistency Score 93.6 vs 92.7
  • Discussion Board Category 50.1 vs 37.9
  • News Article Category 68.0 vs 56.0
  • Marketing Copy Category 57.7 vs 53.2

Walter Writes

9 wins
  • Bypass rate Score 72.8 vs 38.1
  • GPTZero Detector 87.8 vs 3.0
  • Originality.ai Detector 91.5 vs 52.4
  • Copyleaks Detector 89.3 vs 58.2
  • ZeroGPT Detector 71.6 vs 43.7
  • Winston AI Detector 96.5 vs 71.6
  • Academic Essay Category 71.4 vs 61.8
  • Blog Post Category 61.2 vs 56.8
  • Application Essay Category 66.1 vs 62.3

Same prompt, both outputs

Both tools were given this AI-written passage in the October 2026 cycle. Below it is what each one returned. This prompt was picked by a fixed rule, not by how the tools scored.

Cover Letter · Application Essay · written by claude-sonnet-5-5 · 414 words

Dear Hiring Team,

I'm writing to apply for the freelance documentary editor position. With eight years of experience shaping nonfiction stories for broadcast, streaming, and festival audiences, I bring both technical precision and a strong narrative instinct to every project I touch.

My career began as an assistant editor on a feature-length documentary about coastal communities facing displacement. Working alongside the director, I logged more than 200 hours of footage and helped build the assembly cut that ultimately secured additional funding. That experience taught me what I still believe today: great documentary editing is about finding the story that already exists in the material, then having the discipline to let it breathe.

Since then, I've edited projects ranging from 8-minute web shorts to a 90-minute feature that premiered at a regional film festival. I'm fluent in Adobe Premiere Pro and DaVinci Resolve, and I'm comfortable with Avid Media Composer when a project demands it. I also handle my own basic color correction, audio cleanup, and motion graphics, which helps keep budgets lean and timelines tight. For archival-heavy projects, I'm experienced in organizing large media libraries, tracking licensing requirements, and working with mixed formats and frame rates without compromising quality.

What I value most in this work is collaboration. I've learned that every director has a different relationship with their footage, and my job is to listen closely before I make a single cut. I provide clear, organized review cuts, welcome candid feedback, and communicate proactively when I see structural problems or opportunities. Producers have told me they appreciate that I meet deadlines and flag issues early rather than late.

Recently, I edited a short documentary profiling a third-generation bakery owner for a nonprofit client. The raw interviews were scattered and emotionally uneven. By restructuring the film around a single morning of work, I created a quiet, intimate piece that was later selected for two festivals and drove a measurable increase in the client's donations.

As a freelancer, I'm accustomed to working remotely and adapting quickly to new teams, workflows, and creative visions. I maintain a reliable editing setup with secure backup systems, and I'm happy to work within your preferred file-sharing and review platforms.

I would welcome the chance to discuss how my skills could support your upcoming projects. My portfolio and reel are available at the link below, and I'm happy to provide references upon request. Thank you for your time and consideration.

Sincerely, [Your Name] [Phone Number] | [Email Address] [Portfolio Link]

Show the full input

516 words (input 414)

Dear Hiring Team,

I am applying for the freelance documentary editor position. Since I have eight years' experience in preparing nonfiction stories for broadcast, streaming, and festival audiences, I bring both technical accuracy and a good sense of narrative to each project I work on.

I started my career as an assistant editor on a feature-length documentary concerning coastal communities that were facing displacement. Together with the director I recorded over 200 hours of footage and contributed to the preparation of the assembly cut which in the end obtained further funding. It was from that experience that I learned a lesson which I still hold to this day, namely that excellent documentary editing consists in discovering the story which is already present in the material and then exercising the necessary discipline to let it breathe.

Since that time I have edited projects ranging from 8-minute web shorts to a 90-minute feature which had its premiere at a regional film festival. I am fluent in Adobe Premiere Pro and DaVinci Resolve and am at ease with Avid Media Composer when a project requires it. I also carry out my own basic colour correction, audio cleaning, and motion graphics, a practice which helps to keep the budgets low and the timelines tight. With regard to projects that involve a lot of archival material, I have experience in organising large media libraries, keeping track of licensing requirements, and working with different formats and frame rates without having to compromise quality.

The most important thing to me in this project is working together. I have found that each director tends to relate to their footage in their own way, and therefore I make it a point to pay close attention before carrying out any cut. I prepare clear and well-organized review cuts, am open to honest feedback, and keep producers informed in advance if I notice any structural problems or potential improvements. Producers have mentioned that they value the fact that I keep to deadline and raise issues early rather than waiting until later.

I recently edited a short documentary about a bakery owner who is in his third generation of running the business for a nonprofit client. The unedited interviews were dispersed and emotionally inconsistent. By basing the film on a single morning of work, I produced a calm and personal piece which was subsequently chosen for two film festivals and resulted in a significant rise in the client's donations.

Since I work as a freelancer, I have become used to working from a distance and to adjusting swiftly to new teams, different workflows, and various creative ideas. I have a dependable editing setup complete with secure backup systems, and I am willing to use the file-sharing and review platforms that you prefer.

I look forward to talking about the ways in which my skills could assist your forthcoming projects. You can find my portfolio and reel at the link given below, and if you'd like I can supply references. Thank you for taking the time to consider this.

Sincerely, [Your Name] [Phone Number] | [Email Address] [Portfolio Link]

Show the full output
  • GPTZero0.00caught
  • Pangram0.00caught
  • Winston AI0.11caught
  • ZeroGPT0.58passed
  • Copyleaks0.00caught
  • Originality.ai1.00passed

Passed 2 of 6 detectors.

Every Grammarly run in October 2026 →

488 words (input 414)

I am interested in the Freelance Documentary Editor opportunity. After eight years of editing nonfiction documentaries for broadcast, streaming and festival audiences, I can help shape your next documentary project. I am skilled technically but also creatively; therefore, I always look for the best way to tell your story through the editing process.

I started by assisting the Director on a full length documentary about Coastal Communities losing their homes. During production we logged over 200 hours of footage and built an Assembly Cut (the first cut) that ultimately led to securing additional funding. This experience taught me one thing I still believe today: Great documentary editing finds the story that is already present in your footage, then allows it to "breathe" in its final form.

In addition to creating an Assembly Cut, I have worked on many other documentary projects including several 8 minute web shorts and a 90 minute feature documentary that premiered at a Regional Film Festival. I am proficient in using Adobe Premiere Pro & DaVinci Resolve, and I will use Avid Media Composer if required by the Project Manager. Additionally, I do some simple color correction, audio cleaning, and create all the Motion Graphics associated with the project. Doing these tasks internally enables the producer to save money on their budget while keeping the timeline tight. On archive heavy projects, I organize large media libraries, track licensing requirements, and work with multiple formats and frame rates without sacrificing quality.

The most important aspect of this work is teamwork. Every Director has a unique relationship with his/her footage and it's up to me to listen intently before making the first edit. As such, I provide well-organized Review Cuts with clear explanations, encourage honest feedback, and will alert producers proactively when I recognize structural issues or potential improvements. In fact, producers have informed me that they appreciate my ability to meet deadlines and point out problems/areas of improvement before they become major issues.

Most recently, I completed a short documentary film about a Third Generation Bakery Owner for a Non-Profit Client. The raw interviews were all over the place and emotionally uneven. Through restructuring the film around a single morning of work, I produced a quiet and intimate film that was later selected into two film festivals and increased donations to the Non-Profit Client.

As a freelancer, I am used to working from home and quickly adjusting to new teams, workflow(s), and creative direction. I have a reliable editing system with redundant backup systems, and I am willing to utilize your preferred File Sharing Platform(s) and Review System(s).

Thank you for taking the time to read my letter. If you would like to speak further regarding how my skills may be able to assist your future projects, please contact me. Both my Portfolio and Reel are located here: [Portfolio Link]. Please feel free to ask for References.

Sincerely, [Your Name] [Phone Number] | [Email Address]

Show the full output
  • GPTZero0.89passed
  • Pangram0.00caught
  • Winston AI1.00passed
  • ZeroGPT0.93passed
  • Copyleaks1.00passed
  • Originality.ai1.00passed

Passed 5 of 6 detectors.

Every Walter Writes run in October 2026 →

Each chip is one detector's score for that output, from 0 (AI) to 1 (human). A score of 0.50 or higher counts as a pass and shows green; below that the detector caught it and the chip shows red.

Questions people ask

Is Grammarly better than Walter Writes?

Walter Writes finished 2.2 points ahead of Grammarly in the October 2026 cycle, 63.53 to 61.29, ranking #10 against #14 in a field of 14. Walter Writes scored higher on 5 of 6 detectors and 3 of 6 writing categories. Both tools ran the same 30 prompts, scored by the same 6 detectors, under methodology v1.3.0; every input, output and verdict is published.

Which bypasses AI detectors better, Grammarly or Walter Writes?

Walter Writes posted the higher bypass rate, 72.8 vs 38.1, and scored higher on 5 of 6 detectors. Walter Writes led on GPTZero, Originality.ai, Copyleaks, Winston AI and ZeroGPT.

Do Grammarly and Walter Writes keep the original meaning?

Grammarly preserved meaning better, 85.5 vs 70.4 on our 0–100 similarity scale. On readability, Grammarly rated higher, 72.2 vs 63.5. Penalties this cycle: Grammarly −3.0, Walter Writes −9.0.