Skip to content
The September 2026 results are in: WriteHuman holds #1, and newcomer SupWriter debuts at #5.Read the full analysis →
HumanizerBench

Head to head · September 2026 cycle

Grammarly vs WriteHuman

WriteHuman finished 17.9 points ahead of Grammarly in the September 2026 cycle, 78.29 to 60.35, ranking #1 against #12 in a field of 14. WriteHuman scored higher on 5 of 5 detectors and 7 of 7 writing categories. Grammarly came out ahead on meaning preservation (86.4 vs 72.3) and readability (66.1 vs 56.9).

60.35 /100
overall score
#12 /14
rank ▼ 1
+17.94
WriteHuman leads →
Detectors
0 5
Categories
0 7
Components
2 3
78.29 /100
overall score
#1 /14
rank -
Last tested
Prompts
33
Methodology
v1.2.0

Score components

What the overall score is made of: bypass rate weighs 42%, meaning preservation 32%, readability 16%, consistency across categories 10%. Output-quality penalties come off the total. How scoring works →

Bypass rate WriteHuman by 49.0
41.1 90.1
Meaning preservation Grammarly by 14.1
86.4 72.3
Readability Grammarly by 9.1
66.1 56.9
Consistency WriteHuman by 3.4
78.7 82.1
Penalties fewer is better WriteHuman by 3.0
−3.0 None

Detector by detector

Share of each tool's outputs that a detector classified as human-written. WriteHuman took 5 of 5.

GPTZero WriteHuman by 55.9
15.9 71.8
Originality.ai WriteHuman by 48.0
43.4 91.4
Copyleaks WriteHuman by 26.4
60.3 86.7
Winston AI WriteHuman by 45.2
38.9 84.1
ZeroGPT WriteHuman by 19.8
58.0 77.8

Writing categories

Category score per writing context: bypass credit only for real rewrites, blended with the category's own meaning preservation and readability. Small categories swing; the prompt count is shown on each row. How category scores work →

Academic Essay Application Essay Blog Post Business Email Marketing Copy Discussion Board News Article Academic Essay: Grammarly 69.5 · WriteHuman 84.1 Application Essay: Grammarly 55.0 · WriteHuman 71.6 Blog Post: Grammarly 58.9 · WriteHuman 83.9 Business Email: Grammarly 44.7 · WriteHuman 56.7 Marketing Copy: Grammarly 56.5 · WriteHuman 82.1 Discussion Board: Grammarly 44.5 · WriteHuman 78.2 News Article: Grammarly 62.8 · WriteHuman 78.3
Grammarly WriteHuman Outer ring = 100
Academic Essay 6 prompts WriteHuman by 14.6
69.5 84.1
Application Essay 6 prompts WriteHuman by 16.6
55.0 71.6
Blog Post 6 prompts WriteHuman by 25.0
58.9 83.9
Business Email 3 prompts WriteHuman by 12.0
44.7 56.7
Marketing Copy 6 prompts WriteHuman by 25.5
56.5 82.1
Discussion Board 3 prompts WriteHuman by 33.7
44.5 78.2
News Article 3 prompts WriteHuman by 15.5
62.8 78.3

Head-to-head history

Overall score in every cycle both tools were tested. WriteHuman has finished ahead in 4 of 4 shared cycles.

40 50 60 70 80 90 June 2026 July 2026 August 2026 September 2026 June 2026: WriteHuman 83.59 (#2) June 2026: Grammarly 56.50 (#12) July 2026: WriteHuman 73.07 (#1) July 2026: Grammarly 53.38 (#12) August 2026: WriteHuman 76.69 (#1) August 2026: Grammarly 52.91 (#11) September 2026: WriteHuman 78.29 (#1) September 2026: Grammarly 60.35 (#12) 60.4 78.3
Grammarly WriteHuman
Cycle Grammarly WriteHuman Margin
September 2026 60.35 #12 78.29 #1 → 17.9
August 2026 52.91 #11 76.69 #1 → 23.8
July 2026 53.38 #12 73.07 #1 → 19.7
June 2026 56.50 #12 83.59 #2 → 27.1

Where each one wins

Every measure above that one tool won outright, largest margin first within each group.

Grammarly

2 wins
  • Meaning preservation Score 86.4 vs 72.3
  • Readability Score 66.1 vs 56.9

WriteHuman

15 wins
  • Bypass rate Score 90.1 vs 41.1
  • Penalties Score None vs −3.0
  • Consistency Score 82.1 vs 78.7
  • GPTZero Detector 71.8 vs 15.9
  • Originality.ai Detector 91.4 vs 43.4
  • Winston AI Detector 84.1 vs 38.9
  • Copyleaks Detector 86.7 vs 60.3
  • ZeroGPT Detector 77.8 vs 58.0
  • Discussion Board Category 78.2 vs 44.5
  • Marketing Copy Category 82.1 vs 56.5
  • and 5 more

Questions people ask

Is Grammarly better than WriteHuman?

WriteHuman finished 17.9 points ahead of Grammarly in the September 2026 cycle, 78.29 to 60.35, ranking #1 against #12 in a field of 14. WriteHuman scored higher on 5 of 5 detectors and 7 of 7 writing categories. Both tools ran the same 33 prompts, scored by the same 5 detectors, under methodology v1.2.0; every input, output and verdict is published.

Which bypasses AI detectors better, Grammarly or WriteHuman?

WriteHuman posted the higher bypass rate, 90.1 vs 41.1, and scored higher on 5 of 5 detectors. WriteHuman led on GPTZero, Originality.ai, Copyleaks, Winston AI and ZeroGPT.

Do Grammarly and WriteHuman keep the original meaning?

Grammarly preserved meaning better, 86.4 vs 72.3 on our 0–100 similarity scale. On readability, Grammarly rated higher, 66.1 vs 56.9. Penalties this cycle: Grammarly −3.0, WriteHuman None.