Head to head · September 2026 cycle
Super Humanizer vs WriteHuman
WriteHuman finished 17.3 points ahead of Super Humanizer in the September 2026 cycle, 78.29 to 60.97, ranking #1 against #11 in a field of 14. WriteHuman scored higher on 5 of 5 detectors and 7 of 7 writing categories. Super Humanizer came out ahead on meaning preservation (74.2 vs 72.3).
- Detectors
- 0 – 5
- Categories
- 0 – 7
- Components
- 1 – 4
Score components
What the overall score is made of: bypass rate weighs 42%, meaning preservation 32%, readability 16%, consistency across categories 10%. Output-quality penalties come off the total. How scoring works →
CIs overlap marks a gap that sits inside both tools' published 95% confidence intervals for that component; it may not survive another cycle.
Detector by detector
Share of each tool's outputs that a detector classified as human-written. WriteHuman took 5 of 5.
Writing categories
Category score per writing context: bypass credit only for real rewrites, blended with the category's own meaning preservation and readability. Small categories swing; the prompt count is shown on each row. How category scores work →
Head-to-head history
Overall score in every cycle both tools were tested. WriteHuman has finished ahead in 4 of 4 shared cycles.
| Cycle | Super Humanizer | WriteHuman | Margin |
|---|---|---|---|
| September 2026 | 60.97 #11 | 78.29 #1 | → 17.3 |
| August 2026 | 55.86 #10 | 76.69 #1 | → 20.8 |
| July 2026 | 54.13 #11 | 73.07 #1 | → 18.9 |
| June 2026 | 64.75 #11 | 83.59 #2 | → 18.8 |
Where each one wins
Every measure above that one tool won outright, largest margin first within each group.
Super Humanizer
1 win- Meaning preservation Score 74.2 vs 72.3
WriteHuman
16 wins- Penalties Score None vs −5.0
- Bypass rate Score 90.1 vs 64.4
- Consistency Score 82.1 vs 68.5
- Readability Score 56.9 vs 52.1
- Winston AI Detector 84.1 vs 52.2
- Copyleaks Detector 86.7 vs 63.7
- Originality.ai Detector 91.4 vs 71.0
- GPTZero Detector 71.8 vs 54.6
- ZeroGPT Detector 77.8 vs 76.9
- Marketing Copy Category 82.1 vs 51.2
- and 6 more
Questions people ask
Is Super Humanizer better than WriteHuman?
WriteHuman finished 17.3 points ahead of Super Humanizer in the September 2026 cycle, 78.29 to 60.97, ranking #1 against #11 in a field of 14. WriteHuman scored higher on 5 of 5 detectors and 7 of 7 writing categories. Both tools ran the same 33 prompts, scored by the same 5 detectors, under methodology v1.2.0; every input, output and verdict is published.
Which bypasses AI detectors better, Super Humanizer or WriteHuman?
WriteHuman posted the higher bypass rate, 90.1 vs 64.4, and scored higher on 5 of 5 detectors. WriteHuman led on GPTZero, Originality.ai, Copyleaks, Winston AI and ZeroGPT.
Do Super Humanizer and WriteHuman keep the original meaning?
Super Humanizer preserved meaning better, 74.2 vs 72.3 on our 0–100 similarity scale, though the confidence intervals overlap. On readability, WriteHuman rated higher, 56.9 vs 52.1. Penalties this cycle: Super Humanizer −5.0, WriteHuman None.