Skip to content
November 2026 results: WriteHuman first, Phrasly climbs to fifth. Read the analysis →
HumanizerBench

Compare AI humanizers

Pick two to four tools and read them side by side, or open any pair's full head-to-head page. Every number comes from the same November 2026 benchmark run: the same prompts, the same detectors, the same scoring, all of it published.

Pick 2 to 4 tools 3 of 4 selected

Pick exactly two for a full head-to-head page with charts, history and a written verdict.

Metric
WriteHuman #1 · 70.11
StealthGPT #2 · 69.47
Clever AI Humanizer #3 · 68.48
Overall
Leaderboard rank#1#2#3 ▲ 1
Overall score70.1169.4768.48
Score componentsBypass 42%, meaning 32%, readability 16%, consistency 10%; penalties come off the total.
Bypass rate95% CI shown under each value81.176.7–85.466.056.4–74.866.762.1–69.5
Meaning preservation59.267.365.8
Readability55.477.760.9
Consistency across categories92.488.096.5
Penalties−1.0−1.0None
Detector bypass ratesShare of runs each detector classified as human-written.
GPTZero99.971.495.5
Originality.ai36.528.824.0
Copyleaks96.790.096.7
Winston AI97.281.196.8
ZeroGPT87.363.684.6
Pangram68.960.92.7
Writing categoriesCategory score: bypass credit only for real rewrites, blended with the category's own meaning and readability.
Academic Essay6 prompts56.269.764.1
Application Essay6 prompts74.363.468.8
Blog Post6 prompts66.775.463.5
Marketing Copy6 prompts73.060.664.3
Discussion Board3 prompts70.967.566.9
News Article3 prompts61.165.665.5
Pricing & accessStandard monthly entry price, without annual discounts or promotions. Usage allowances differ; compare plan details.
Monthly price$20.00/mo$29.99/moFree
Entry plan includesBasic: 80 requests/month, up to 600 input words each.Pro: 50,000 words/month, up to 1,000 input words per use.Free humanizer; up to 3,000 input words per request.
Free tierYesNot confirmedYes
Free allowance3 requests / 30 days; 250 words each—3,000 words / request; no fixed monthly cap
Free try / trial———

Every matchup

Each cell is the row tool's overall score minus the column tool's, November 2026 cycle. Green means the row leads, red the column. Click a cell to open that head-to-head; the last column is each tool's win–loss record against the rest of the field.

120 pairs · 16 tools
Row minus column #1 #2 #3 #4 #5 #6 #7 #8 #9 #10 #11 #12 #13 #14 #15 #16 W–L
#1 WriteHuman 70.11 +0.6 +1.6 +4.9 +5.8 +5.9 +7.9 +8.9 +9.1 +9.5 +10.5 +11.2 +11.7 +12.6 +15.2 +17.6 15–0
#2 StealthGPT 69.47 −0.6 +1.0 +4.3 +5.1 +5.2 +7.3 +8.2 +8.4 +8.9 +9.9 +10.5 +11.1 +12.0 +14.5 +17.0 14–1
#3 Clever AI Humanizer 68.48 −1.6 −1.0 +3.3 +4.1 +4.2 +6.3 +7.2 +7.4 +7.9 +8.9 +9.5 +10.1 +11.0 +13.5 +16.0 13–2
#4 Humanize AI Pro 65.18 −4.9 −4.3 −3.3 +0.8 +0.9 +3.0 +3.9 +4.1 +4.6 +5.6 +6.2 +6.8 +7.7 +10.2 +12.7 12–3
#5 Phrasly 64.35 −5.8 −5.1 −4.1 −0.8 +0.1 +2.1 +3.1 +3.3 +3.7 +4.8 +5.4 +6.0 +6.9 +9.4 +11.8 11–4
#6 Undetectable.ai 64.24 −5.9 −5.2 −4.2 −0.9 −0.1 +2.0 +3.0 +3.2 +3.6 +4.7 +5.3 +5.9 +6.8 +9.3 +11.7 10–5
#7 Stealth Writer 62.20 −7.9 −7.3 −6.3 −3.0 −2.1 −2.0 +1.0 +1.2 +1.6 +2.6 +3.3 +3.8 +4.7 +7.3 +9.7 9–6
#8 Ryne AI 61.24 −8.9 −8.2 −7.2 −3.9 −3.1 −3.0 −1.0 +0.2 +0.6 +1.7 +2.3 +2.9 +3.8 +6.3 +8.7 8–7
#9 SupWriter 61.05 −9.1 −8.4 −7.4 −4.1 −3.3 −3.2 −1.2 −0.2 +0.4 +1.5 +2.1 +2.7 +3.6 +6.1 +8.5 7–8
#10 AI Humanize io 60.62 −9.5 −8.9 −7.9 −4.6 −3.7 −3.6 −1.6 −0.6 −0.4 +1.0 +1.7 +2.2 +3.1 +5.7 +8.1 6–9
#11 Super Humanizer 59.57 −10.5 −9.9 −8.9 −5.6 −4.8 −4.7 −2.6 −1.7 −1.5 −1.0 +0.6 +1.2 +2.1 +4.6 +7.1 5–10
#12 Grammarly 58.95 −11.2 −10.5 −9.5 −6.2 −5.4 −5.3 −3.3 −2.3 −2.1 −1.7 −0.6 +0.6 +1.5 +4.0 +6.5 4–11
#13 Humbot 58.38 −11.7 −11.1 −10.1 −6.8 −6.0 −5.9 −3.8 −2.9 −2.7 −2.2 −1.2 −0.6 +0.9 +3.4 +5.9 3–12
#14 HIX Bypass 57.47 −12.6 −12.0 −11.0 −7.7 −6.9 −6.8 −4.7 −3.8 −3.6 −3.1 −2.1 −1.5 −0.9 +2.5 +5.0 2–13
#15 Walter Writes 54.95 −15.2 −14.5 −13.5 −10.2 −9.4 −9.3 −7.3 −6.3 −6.1 −5.7 −4.6 −4.0 −3.4 −2.5 +2.5 1–14
#16 Rephrasy 52.50 −17.6 −17.0 −16.0 −12.7 −11.8 −11.7 −9.7 −8.7 −8.5 −8.1 −7.1 −6.5 −5.9 −5.0 −2.5 0–15

Rankings are recomputed every cycle from published inputs, outputs and detector verdicts. How scoring works →